1. To
keep a record of what I read. Simple as that – just to look back and see what I
have read over 12-24 months is interesting, as my appetite for classic fiction
wanes and is replaced by recent history, for example.
2. To
keep a note of what happens in the novels I read. I appreciate that probably
sounds a bit daft at first, but if you think about it, how many times have you
picked up a book and wondered whether you had read it or not? Writing down what
happens helps fixed the main events of a story in my memory. Of course,
re-reading books and rediscovering them can be great fun, but I find it
frustrating not being able to remember what happens in a book even though I
know I have read it.
3. To
make me a careful reader. This follows on very much from the above – if I know
I am going to have to write something about a novel, I will read it more
carefully than otherwise. I will even make marginal notes and highlight
sections if I am being really conscientious. When I do this of course it means
I am more likely to remember the detail of the book, but writing it down
reinforces this.
4. To
have something interesting and original to say about the novel/book.
(The bonus reason is that I occasionally use this blog to
write about something other than my reading. It’s harmless, and gives me
somewhere to work out my thoughts, or maybe just show off a bit, even if just
to myself.)
So when I finished Evelyn Waugh’s 1946 novel “Brideshead
Revisited” and found I didn’t really have anything new or insightful to say
about the novel, I was disappointed. Looking back on the list above however, I
realised there are nevertheless plenty of reasons to blog about the novel, even
if it won’t be as amusing or clever as I would have hoped – it still ticks
three of the four boxes.
“Brideshead Revisited” is narrated by Charles Ryder, an
upper middle class officer who is billeted in the grounds of an English country
house at an indeterminate point in the second world war. He is startled to
realise he knows the house well, having visited as a guest many times. The body
of the novel is a series of reminiscences starting with Charles’s time at
Oxford in the early 20’s, when he meets Sebastian Flyte, the younger son of the
Brideshead family. The fact he is a younger son, and therefore unlikely to
inherit the family title or house, is significant – he dedicates himself to a
life of excess, ending as an alcoholic wreck. The surname Flyte is also telling
– Sebastian is quintessentially flighty, a decadent aesthete interested in only
what pleases him. The bond between Ryder and Flyte is strong and instantaneous,
and their lives run in parallel until Sebastian’s alcoholism finally pulls them
apart.
The sexual nature of their friendship is fairly explicit –
bearing in mind that gay relationships were illegal in the UK before 1968, and
only decriminalised in very specific circumstances thereafter. They have an
openly gay friend – Antoine Blanche – who is accepted by them without judgment
or any hint of censure. Waugh is as clear as possible on this point, dropping
multiple hints. To give one example, Charles’s cousin, Jasper, visits him early
on during his time at Oxford, and warns him “Beware of the Anglo-Catholics –
they’re all sodomites” (28). The Flyte’s are one of England’s leading
aristocratic Catholic families.
They grow apart, and Charles becomes an artist. He
eventually marries, although his relationship with his wife is distant, and he
has no interest in his children. He goes on an expedition into the South
American jungle, and is away for two years – when he meets his wife after this
absence their lack of affectionate is palpable. On the stormy Atlantic crossing
home he begins an affair with Sebastian’s sister, Julia, but she ultimately
rejects him in favour of her Catholic faith. In a book-ending chapter back at
Brideshead, Ryder reveals he too has embraced Catholicism.
This is a complex novel with many themes. The loss of
Edwardian England, preserved in part in Brideshead and Oxford, but torn apart
by the devastation of the Great War. Waugh’s 1959 introduction to the novel
talks about it being about the imminent loss of the great English country
house, but that seems a minor theme to a 21st century reader.
Catholicism, the Second World War, love, homosexuality – it makes it seem a
worthy novel, and eventually it is, but the early scenes in Oxford in
particular are extraordinarily evocative:
“Oxford, in those
days, was still a city of aquatint. In her spacious and quiet streets men
walked and spoke as they had done in Newman's day; her autumnal mists, her grey
springtime, and the rare glory of her summer days - such as that day - when the
chestnut was in flower and the bells rang out high and clear over her gables
and cupolas, exhaled the soft airs of centuries of youth. It was this cloistral
hush which gave our laughter its resonance, and carried it still, joyously,
over the intervening clamour.”
No comments:
Post a Comment